Steroid Efficacy on Audiologic Recovery in Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Vestibular Schwannoma: A Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (i) estimate the incidence of vestibular schwannoma (VS) among patients in an integrated healthcare system who present for evaluation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and (ii) evaluate the efficacy of empiric steroid therapy on audiologic recovery among SSNHL patients ultimately diagnosed with VS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting with SSNHL in 2021 at a multicenter integrated healthcare system serving over 4 million members. Patient demographics, audiometric data, VS diagnosis, therapeutic steroid intervention, and data regarding treatment response were recorded. A clinically significant audiometric improvement was defined as (i) an increase of 15% in word recognition score, (ii) a decrease of 15 dB in four-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) using frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, or (iii) a PTA of <20 dB on follow-up audiogram. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight patients were reviewed, of which 309 (56.0% male; mean, 57.5 years) met the inclusion criteria with audiometric data and magnetic resonance imaging data. Ten patients (70.0% male; mean, 51.3 years) were found to have VS. Of these, five patients received oral steroid therapy alone, and five had combination therapy (oral + intratympanic steroid injections). No patients received intratympanic steroid therapy alone. Median PTA improvement with steroid therapy was 3.1-dB hearing loss, and median word recognition score improvement was 16.5%. Six of 10 patients demonstrated clinically significant audiometric improvement with steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest US-based study showcasing the prevalence of VS in patients originally presenting with SSNHL. It also reinforces previous findings that VS does not preclude trials of steroid therapy.

Intratympanic steroid injection versus hyperbaric oxygen therapy in refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of intratympanic steroid (ITS) injection and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy as salvage treatments for refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from the date of the database inception to June 2020. All studies reporting the use of salvage ITS and HBO treatments in refractory SSNHL patients were included. Subsequently, the full texts of the eligible studies were evaluated. METHODS: The quality and bias of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane's risk of bias tools for nonrandomized and randomized studies, respectively. The data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 3; Biostat, Englewood, NJ). RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen subjects in 3 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial met our inclusion criteria. The pooled results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the mean posttreatment hearing gain between the ITS and HBO groups. The changes in word discrimination and hearing gain at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 Hz were also comparable between the two salvage treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in hearing improvements between salvage ITS injection and salvage HBO therapy after failed primary systemic steroid treatment in patients with SSNHL. However, spontaneous recovery could bias the treatment outcomes, and these results should be interpreted with caution. Clinicians may choose these salvage treatments according to personal experience and treatment availability. In cases in which specialized HBO facilities are difficult to access, salvage ITS injection can be provided with comparable responses.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus Intratympanic Steroid for Salvage Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and intratympanic steroids (ITS) as salvage treatment for patients with refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). DATA SOURCES: Electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases to June 1, 2020. METHODS: For each outcome measure, a forest plot was generated and a pooled relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) was calculated. Potential publication bias in the meta-analysis was assessed using funnel plot. RESULTS: The numbers of cases with hearing improvements and pure tone averages (PTA) changes after salvage treatment were entered into the R software to calculate the pooled effect of HBOT compared with ITS. When pooling the results of the studies reporting the proportion of patients with hearing improvement, a fixed-effects model was used. We calculated the RR and found no significant difference when HBOT compared with ITS (RR = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-1.42, p = 0.55). With respect to the PTA changes, a fixed-effects model was used. The improvement in the PTA (in dB) was calculated in MD and no significant difference was found between the two groups (MD = 0.55, 95% CI: -1.76-2.86, p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Both HBOT and ITS offer some benefits for refractory SSNHL patients, and there were no significant differences in hearing outcomes between the two modalities. Future RCTs that include large samples are needed to demonstrate superiority of one of the treatments.

The Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Severe Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of combined hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and steroid therapy in severe idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). METHODS: Between January 2010 and July 2017, we evaluated 218 patients with ISSNHL and divided them into 2 groups: those with hearing loss greater than 80 dB and those with hearing loss of 60-79 dB. Each group was further divided into 3 groups according to the treatment method: oral steroids alone (PO), PO+intratympanic injection (IT), and PO+IT+HBOT. The treatment effect was evaluated for improvement in hearing thresholds at mid-term (3 weeks later) and final term (2 months later). RESULTS: When comparing the 3 treatment groups within the group that had a hearing loss greater than 80 dB, no differences were observed in the gaps in hearing thresholds and in the duration of improvement (P = .0764 and .2938, respectively). However, in the group with 60-79 dB hearing loss, the gaps in hearing thresholds at mid-term were 27.50 dB in the PO group, 38.13 dB in the PO+IT group, and 51.25 dB in the PO+IT+HBOT group. The treatment was more effective and faster in the initial period in the PO+IT+HBOT group than in the other groups. In addition, the results of frequency analysis showed greatest treatment efficacy at low frequencies of hearing. CONCLUSION: Patients with ISSNHL above 80 dB are less likely to recover hearing even after PO+IT+HBOT. However, this treatment initially accelerates recovery in patients with a hearing loss below 80 dB. Therefore, the appropriate indication for HBOT benefits in patients with severe or profound ISSNHL should be reviewed.

Long-term efficacy of triple semicircular canal plugging in the treatment of patients with ipsilateral delayed endolymphatic hydrops.

This study aims to explore the long-term efficacy of triple semicircular canal plugging (TSCP) in the treatment of intractable ipsilateral delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH), so as to provide an alternative therapy for this disease. Forty-eight patients diagnosed with ipsilateral DEH referred to vertigo clinic of our hospital between Dec. 2010 and Dec. 2017, were included in this study for retrospective analysis. All patients were followed up for 2 years. Vertigo control and auditory functions were measured and analyzed. Pure tone audiometry, caloric test, and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) were performed in two-year follow-up. Forty-five patients who accepted intratympanic gentamicin (26.7 mg/mL) twice given one week apart were selected as a control group. The total control rate of vertigo in TSCP group was 97.9% (47/48) in the two-year follow-up, with complete control rate of 83.3% (40/48) and substantial control rate of 14.6% (7/48). The rate of hearing loss was 22.9% (11/48). The total control rate of vertigo in intratympanic gentamicin group was 80.0% (36/45), with complete control rate of 57.8% (26/45) and substantial control rate of 22.2% (10/45), and the rate of hearing loss was 20.0% (9/45). The vertigo control rate of TSCP was significantly higher than that of intratympanic gentamicin (χ2 = 6.01, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference of hearing loss rate between two groups. (χ2 = 0.12, p > 0.05). TSCP, which can reduce vertiginous symptoms in patients with intractable ipsilateral DEH, represents an effective therapy for this disorder.

Clinical characteristics and correlation between hearing outcomes after different episodes of recurrent idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a rare disease. In this study, we evaluated the correlations between hearing recovery after the first and recurrent episodes of ISSNHL and characterized the clinical features of different episodes of ISSNHL. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records pertaining to the period 2008-2018. A total of 30 patients (16 male, 14 female) who had experienced at least two episodes of ISSNHL were included. All patients were had received steroid therapy (including systemic and IT) and/or hyperbaric oxygen therapy within 2 weeks after the onset of disease. The SDRG's criteria was used for the grading of hearing recovery. RESULTS: The median age at the first and second episode of ISSNHL was 48 and 53.5 years, respectively; a total of 30% of patients presented with vertigo in the first episode and 40% presented with vertigo in the second episode. The hearing outcomes of both episodes showed significant improvement after treatment. The rate of complete recovery after the first and second episodes was 46.67% and 33.33%, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between the treatment outcomes of the first and second episodes (r = 0.721, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In ISSNHL, hearing recovery after a recurrent episode is significantly correlated with the hearing outcome after the initial episode (p = 0.042). The treatment outcome of the first episode is a prognostic factor for the outcomes of recurrent episodes.

Comparing the Efficiencies of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Intratympanic Steroid Treatment for Sudden Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiencies of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and intratympanic steroid (ITS)treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearingloss (ISSHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 136 patients who were treated for ISSHL were reviewed fromthemedical records. All of the patients were given systemic steroid therapy (SST). Among them,33patients received HBOT and 36 patients received ITS treatment following SST. The starting time to treatment, risk factors, hearing level, hearing gain (HG), and recovery rate were evaluated from retrospectiverecords. RESULTS: No substantial change in HG was observed for either the HBOT or ITS treatment cohort (p>0.05). But the time to recovery was higher in the ITS treatment cohort (40%) than in theHBOT cohort (17%). The starting time to ITS treatment was 4 days (range: 1-30) and that to HBOT was 8 days (range:3-30). There was a significant difference in the starting time to treatment (Mann-Whitney U-test, p=0.043). Also, hearing loss in the HBOT group was significantly higher than in the ITS treatment group. A significant difference was observed before and after ITS treatment (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients compared with late-onset treatment, ITS may be more effective than HBO after SST failure. It can be used as salvage therapy in patients with ISSHL who are unresponsive to a primary systemic steroid. We observed that HBOT didnot improve results when it was started late. Therefore, more studies that include both ITS treatment and HBOTas anearly treatment option are needed.

Recurrences in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Long-Term Observational Study.

Purpose Long-term outcomes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) are poorly studied. The recurrence rate is heterogeneous, and the prognosis of relapses is uncertain. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the recurrence rate of SSNHL and to analyze the correlation with clinical and audiometric characteristics. Method Seventy-three patients with idiopatic SSNHL were evaluated. Clinical and audiometric features were recorded. Seventy patients (95.8%) had at least a 2-year follow-up, whereas 50 (68.4%) had a 5-year follow-up. Results Two- and 5-year recurrence rates were 5.60% and 10.34%, respectively. Mean time lapse between 1st episode and recurrence was 29.33 ± 26.60 months. About 70% of patients had a partial recovery at recurrence. The same ear was affected in 42.8% of patients, the contralateral ear was affected in 42.8% of patients, and recurrence was bilateral in 14.4% of cases. Recurrence correlated only with the presence of tinnitus during follow-up. However, the small number of participants with recurrence represented a limiting factor of our study. Conclusions Recurrences of SSNHL are rare events that can involve ipsilateral or contralateral ear. Further studies are necessary to identify predictors of recurrence.

Different prognoses in patients with profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Background: Inner ear hemorrhage is increasingly recognized as a cochlear lesion that can cause profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Objectives: To investigate changes of cochlear and vestibular function and to compare therapeutic recovery from profound SSNHL induced by different etiologies. Material and methods: Eighty patients with profound SSNHL (≥90 dB) were divided into an inner ear hemorrhage group and a non-inner ear hemorrhage group by MRI. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the therapeutic effects from vertigo and hearing loss and the outcomes of follow-up in the two groups. Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of the overall 14-day therapeutic response rate (20 vs. 48%), the incidence of imbalance (26.7 vs. 6%), the incidence of semicircular canal dysfunction on the affected side (60 vs. 20%), the incidence of abnormal C-VEMP and O-VEMP on the affected side (63.3 vs. 38%; and 60 vs. 30%, respectively), the average hearing threshold (74.2 ± 10.7 vs. 53.6 ± 11.4 dB), and the word recognition score (65.5 ± 21.7 vs. 83.5 ± 24.5%) at a 12-month follow-up. Conclusions and significance: A higher percentage of patients with profound SSNHL induced by inner ear hemorrhage were associated with vertigo and had a poor prognosis.

Efficacy of Intratympanic Steroid on Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: An Analysis of Cases With Negative Prognostic Factors.

Purpose We retrospectively studied the efficacy of intratympanic steroid administration in comparison with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) with negative prognostic factors. Method We enrolled 301 patients (302 ears) with ISSNHL (average hearing level at 250-4000 Hz ≥ 40 dB; time from onset to treatment ≤ 30 days). From August 2002 to March 2009, 174 patients (174 ears) received systemic steroid plus HBO therapy (HBO group), and from June 2015 to January 2018, 127 patients (128 ears) received systemic plus intratympanic steroid (IT group). Hearing outcomes were evaluated by 6 indices: cure rate, marked-recovery rate (percent of patients with hearing gain ≥ 30 dB), recovery rate (percent of patients with hearing gain ≥ 10 dB), hearing gain, hearing level after treatment, and percent hearing improvement compared to the unaffected contralateral ear. Results The recovery rate was significantly higher in the IT group than in the HBO group (80.5% vs. 68.4%, p = .019). The IT group showed a higher recovery rate than the HBO group in patients aged ≥ 60 years ( p = .010), patients with early (≤ 7 days from onset) treatment ( p = .005), patients with initial hearing levels ≥ 90 dB ( p = .037), and patients with vertigo/dizziness ( p = .040). The IT group also showed higher hearing gain and percent hearing improvement than the HBO group in patients with vertigo/dizziness ( p = .046 and p = .026, respectively). Conclusions Systemic plus intratympanic steroid is more effective for ISSNHL than systemic steroid plus HBO, particularly in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as old age, profound hearing loss, and/or presence of vertigo/dizziness.

Tratamento clínico de zumbido primário em adultos e idosos: revisão sistemática / Clinical treatment of primary tinnitus in adults and in the elderly: systematic review

O zumbido no ouvido é definido como uma ilusão auditiva ou sensação sonora endógena, não relacionada a nenhuma fonte externa de estimulação. É um sintoma frequente na população idosa. Até hoje, vários autores argumentam que o desconhecimento da etiologia do zumbido, aliado à subjetividade desta manifestação, mais a sobreposição das enfermidades e dos sintomas que, geralmente, acometem os pacientes idosos, dificultam a obtenção de um bom resultado terapêutico. O objetivo desta revisão foi levantar quais os tratamentos clínicos mais utilizados na prática clínica no tratamento do zumbido primário em adultos e idosos. Procedeu-se à verificação do status dos últimos 5 anos de estudos em textos de acesso livre, no banco de dados eletrônicos da PubMed. Apresentaram tratamentos clínicos para o zumbido primário 25 artigos; aqueles com resultados satisfatórios foram quatro artigos sobre acupuntura, dois sobre neuromodulação de resenha coordenada acústica, um sobre uso combinado de amplificação e gerador de som, e um sobre psicoterapia corporal, que incluíam tanto adultos e idosos, tendo a idade média entre 51 a 54 anos. Não se pode afirmar que os tratamentos propostos são eficazes na cura dos sintomas de zumbido em adultos e idosos, mas sim que existem algumas terapêuticas de baixo custo que apresentam respostas relativamente satisfatórias. (AU)

Tinnitus is defined as a hearing illusion or endogenous auditory sensation that is not related to any external stimulation source. It is a frequent symptom among elderly people. To date, many authors have argued that the lack of knowledge about the tinnitus etiology, added to the subjectivity of this manifestation, and the overlap of other diseases and symptoms that often occur with aged patients make the obtainment of a good therapeutic result difficult. The objective of this review was to find the most used clinical treatment in clinical practice for primary tinnitus on adults and elderly. The status of the last five years of studies in free full texts on PubMed database was checked. Twenty-five articles showed clinical treatment for primary tinnitus, with four articles about acupuncture, two about acoustic coordinate reset neuromodulation, one about sound generator associated with conventional amplification, and one about body-psychotherapy which included adults and elderly with an average age between 51 to 54 years old showing satisfactory results. It is difficult to state that the proposed treatment is efficient on healing the tinnitus symptoms on adults and elderly but there are some low-cost therapies showing relatively satisfactory responses. (AU)

Comparison of Two Different Treatment Protocols Using Systemic and Intratympanic Steroids with and without Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Severe to Profound Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of simultaneous steroid and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with severe to profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), which has a poor prognosis. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with severe to profound ISSNHL (≥70 dB HL) were randomly divided into two groups in a prospective controlled trial: an oral steroid + intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI) group (control group) and an oral steroid + ITSI + HBOT group (study group). Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) results and word discrimination scores (WDS) were compared between the two groups before treatment and 10 days and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Hearing improvement was assessed using the modified American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria. Analyses were by both intention to treat and per protocol. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients completed the 3-month follow-up, and 2 patients in the study group were excluded due to follow-up loss in the per-protocol analysis. In the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the study group showed significantly better hearing levels than did the control group at 500 Hz (p < 0.05) 1 month after treatment and at 1 kHz (p < 0.05) 3 months after treatment. However, the average PTA values and PTA at 2, 4, and 8 kHz showed no significant difference. WDS improvement was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group 3 months after treatment by both per-protocol (66.4 ± 13.3 and 56.7 ± 19.1%, respectively; p = 0.029) and intention-to-treat analyses (65.9 ± 14.1 and 56.7 ± 19.1%, respectively; p = 0.035). The sum of complete and partial hearing recovery for the study group was significantly higher than that for the control group by per-protocol analysis (60.7 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.037) and intention-to-treat analysis (60.0 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the addition of HBOT to steroid combination therapy does not improve the average PTA values in severe to profound ISSNHL; however, it was associated with a better outcome at 500 Hz 1 month after treatment and, at 1 kHz, WDS 3 months after treatment. The sum of complete and partial hearing recovery was significantly higher for the study group than for the control group.

Treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae otitis media in a chinchilla model by transtympanic delivery of antibiotics.

Otits media (OM) is the most frequent indication for antimicrobial prescription to US children. Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) remains one of the most common pathogens causing OM. Successful eradication of S. pneumoniae in the middle ear can be achieved by adhering to a 7-10 day regimen of oral antibiotics. However, oral drug administration is challenging for parents. Lack of adherence has been associated with treatment failure or early relapse. To overcome this challenge, we used a noninvasive formulation to achieve high transtympanic antibiotic flux and cured S. pneumoniae OM in chinchillas. The formulation consists of a thermosensitive in situ gelling hydrogel, chemical permeation enhancers, and an antibiotic. The direct transport of drugs into the middle ear produced high concentrations of ciprofloxacin (in the range of hundreds of micrograms per milliliter) within the first 24 hours of administration. Drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for S. pneumoniae were sustained throughout the 7-day treatment. S. pneumoniae OM in a chinchilla model was successfully eradicated, without causing tissue toxicity. Transtympanic delivery minimized systemic drug exposure, as evidenced by undetectable levels in blood, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as Concurrent Treatment with Systemic Steroids for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Comparison of Three Different Steroid Treatments.

We analyzed 356 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and systemic steroids (n = 161), systemic steroids alone (n = 160), or intratympanic and systemic steroids (n = 35). The main outcome measure was the hearing recovery rate. The effect of other variables, including the initial averaged 5-frequency hearing level, patient age, interval between the onset of symptoms and treatment, presence of vertigo as a complication, presence of diabetes mellitus, smoking history, and presence of hypertension, on the hearing recovery rate was also evaluated. The overall hearing recovery rate was significantly higher for the patients treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and systemic steroids than for those treated with systemic steroids alone (p < 0.001) or systemic and intratympanic steroids (p < 0.001). The presence of vertigo negatively affected hearing recovery. Our findings suggest that hyperbaric oxygen therapy confers a significant additional therapeutic benefit when used in combination with steroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

The Role of Hyperbaric Oxygen as Salvage Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate hearing outcomes after salvage therapy with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) for the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). STUDY DESIGN: Matched control retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients (>18 years) diagnosed with SSNHL. INTERVENTION: Patients received initial therapy with oral and/or intratympanic (IT) steroids with an incomplete response. Eighteen patients underwent salvage therapy with IT steroids and HBO2 (group 1). Eighteen matched controls underwent salvage therapy with IT steroids alone (group 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was improvement in pure tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS). Complications as a result of therapy were also monitored. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, or hearing between the 2 groups ( P > .05). There was no significant difference in mean post-treatment PTA between group 1 (60.3 dB) and group 2 (53.2 dB). There were no significant difference in mean post-treatment WRS between group 1 (42%) and group 2 (51%). Serviceable hearing was defined as a minimum WRS of 50%. Thirty-three percent in group 1 and 42% in group 2 went from nonserviceable hearing to serviceable hearing ( P > .05). PTA and WRS change scores were not significantly affected by age, gender, form of initial treatment, or pre-treatment PTA and WRS. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated no significant difference in hearing outcomes between patients receiving salvage therapy with HBO2 and IT steroids compared to patients receiving IT steroids alone. Larger, prospective randomized trials are needed to better define the role of HBO2 as salvage therapy for SSNHL.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Comparative Study of Different Treatment Modalities

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is hearing loss of at least 30 dB in at least 3 contiguous frequencies within at least 72 hours. There are many different theories to explain it, and many differentmodalities are used for its management, such as: systemic steroids (SSs), intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI), hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT), antiviral drugs, and vasodilators or vasoactive substances. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of the most common treatmentmodalities of ISSNHL and to compare the results if HOTwas not one of the treatment modalities administered. Methods The study was conducted with 22 ISSNHL patients with ages ranging from 34 to 58 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups; group A included 11 patients managed by SSs, ITSI, antiviral therapy, and HOT simultaneously, and group B included 11 patients exposed to the aforementioned modalities, with the exception of HOT. Results After one month, all of the patients in group A showed total improvement in hearing in all frequencies, with pure tone average (PTA) of 18.1 ± 2.2, while in group B, 5/11 (45.5%) patients showed total improvement, and 6 /11 (54.5%) patients showed partial improvement, with a total mean PTA of 28.1 ± 8.7. Conclusion The early administration of HOT in combination with other clinically approved modalities (SSs, ITSI, antiviral therapy) provides better results than the administration of the same modalities, with the exception of HOT, in the treatment of ISSNHL.

Sensorineural hearing loss after spine surgery treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy: two case reports.

Acute idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) following lumbar spinal surgery is an exceedingly rare phenomenon. This paper presents a case of ISSNHL presenting acutely after lumbar spine decompression and fusion treated with transtympanic steroids and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. It also presents the ironic case of SSNHL secondary to presumed viral pathology sustained by the patient's operative surgeon who was treated with transtympanic steroids and HBO2 as well. Proposed etiologies of the patient's ISSNHL include: hypotension, prone operative position, malfitted/malpositioned headrest, microemboli from a cell-saver, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. The role of systemic hypotension as an etiology of ISSNHL is discussed given the fact that there are no reported cases of ISSNHL in orthopedic procedures performed with permissive hypotension. The initiation of steroids and HBO2 therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment for ISSNHL when started within 14 days of symptom onset. HBO2 and transtympanic steroids were initiated 10 days earlier in the operative surgeon, which showed to be a better treatment modality compared to the postoperative patient. ISSNHL in the acute postoperative period of lumbar spinal fusion surgery presents a unique treatment dilemma because systemic steroids are routinely avoided over concerns of pseudarthrosis. Of the seven documented cases of ISSNHL following lumbar spine surgery, none underwent HBO2 as a treatment modality.

Comparison of plasma pharmacokinetics of Tanreqing solution between intratracheal aerosolization and intravenous injection in rats.

A rapid ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for the simultaneous analysis of baicalin, oroxylin A-7-O-ß-d-glucoronide and chlorogenic acid in rats plasma, and applied to comparison of pharmacokinetics of Tanreqing solution between intratracheal aerosolization and intravenous injection. Results of the analytical method validation assay showed high sensitivity, accuracy and suitable recovery. Results of pharmacokinetics showed similar decline phases for baicalin, oroxylin A-7-O-ß-d-glucoronide and chlorogenic acid in two different delivery routes. The half-lives of intratracheal aerosolization and intravenous injection were 0.90 and 1.22 h for baicalin, 0.47 and 0.17 h for oroxylin A-7-O-ß-d-glucoronide and 0.22 and 0.13 h for chlorogenic acid, and this implies that compounds were retained in the lung for a relatively short time. This study was the first to provide important pharmacokinetics information for traditional Chinese medicine delivery to the lung.

Effects of early intratympanic steroid injection in patients with acoustic trauma caused by gunshot noise.

CONCLUSION: This study evaluated the efficacy of concurrent administration of ITSI and systemic steroids in delayed treatment of NIHL after gunshot noise exposure. The results showed additional hearing benefits with administration of ITSI. Further evaluation is warranted to confirm this efficacy. OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluated the effects of early administration of an intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI) in combination with systemic steroids treatment in patients with acoustic trauma caused by gunshot noise. METHODS: Nineteen patients eligible under the criteria established concerning delayed treatment for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received prednisolone (PD) only (n = 8), and those who received PD with ITSI (n = 11). ITSI treatment was initiated simultaneously alongside systemic PD administration. These patients received ITSI every other day for a total of four treatments. Pure-tone air conduction threshold audiometry, to record the pure-tone average (PTA) at 2, 4, and 8 kHz, was conducted upon each patient's initial visit, and 1 month after starting treatment, to evaluate the degree of hearing gain (hearing gain (dB) = (initial PTA) - (final PTA)). RESULTS: The initial PTA in PD-only and PD with ITSI groups were 52.75 ± 15.50 dB and 50.27 ± 12.01 dB, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the two groups, which include age and the number of days that treatment was delayed. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, both the initial PTA and the treatment method showed a significant association (R2 = 0.41). The unstandardized regression coefficient of the initial PTA was 0.47 (p = 0.02). Patients with additional ITSI showed significant improvement in the degree of hearing gain compared with the PD-only group (unstandardized regression coefficient =11.48, p = 0.03).